- A group of consumers earlier this year lodged complaints against Tesla, accusing the company of controlling the spare parts and repair market for its electric vehicles.
- The crux of the matter was that Tesla tightly controls access to essential tools, diagnostics, and parts through very selective authorizations, giving it a monopoly over the EV repair landscape.
- The customers argued that this policy drove up the costs of Tesla’s proprietary repairs while limiting the options for independent repairs or DIY fixes.
- However, a judge presiding over the case recently ruled that the plaintiffs knew, or should have known, what they were getting into when they bought their Teslas.
- The judge dismissed the lawsuit, finding that customers had ample warnings about Tesla’s approach to repairs and parts before purchasing their cars.
My hot take, ladies and gentlemen, is this: the Tesla drama has made another pitstop, this time at the doorsteps of the courthouse. And it turns out, the judge is playing a legal version of “Shoulda, Woulda, Coulda.” The judge basically told frustrated Tesla owners, “Hey, you should’ve read the fine print before falling head over heels for that sleek EV dream machine.”
But really, who’s got the time to sift through pages of policies when there’s an electric sled of a car waiting to whizz you into the future? Still, this ruling does send a clear message – take a good hard look before you plunge into the deep, sometimes monopolized pool of electric vehicle ownership.
Of course, it’s not all bad news. Ever heard the saying, “Necessity is the mother of all invention?” Well, here’s to hoping these troubled Tesla aficionados channel their mechanical frustrations into creating some exciting, possibly offbeat DIY fixes. Now wouldn’t that be a hoot!
Source
